Movies you should see!

And now, a list of my 4 most favorite movies!




Hesten Festen &
Besten of the Hesten Festen II
(Combination Pack)

&

Sister Fister &
Fister Twister
(Combination Pack)

These movies have a grade average of a whopping 7 out of 10 whereas 6 is the highest from the website;www.molesters-R-us.ru and that is a clear indicative of top-quality movies.

Additional information:

Hesten Festen & Besten of the Hesten Festen II:

Stacy Sunset, the star of the movie, is a horse breeder out in the countryside when suddenly one of her horses gets sick. She must go through a lot of trouble to find the right way for her to cure the disease, but there’s only one way to do so.

If you like horses you should not see this movie, if you like to see 30 centimeter cocks impaling women then this is the movie for you! (Besten of the Hesten Festen II has the same storyline as the first one but here they add the fun twist of “Double Penetration” into the plot!)

Sister Fister and Fister Twister:

The teenager Stacy, 52 years old, needs a lesson on how to fist. Demonstrative instructional classes are being advertised in the papers and she decides to learn it once and for all. The teachers greet her with closed fists and the party begins!

If you enjoyed movies as SAW (I, II and III) and the Stanley Kubric masterpiece, Lolita, you will be thrilled by this blend of genres. Jeremy Irons makes a guest appearance as “Audience member nr. 23” in the background.


As I said these movies are true masterpieces in their genres with the exception of Hesten Festen (Mr. Hands Finally gets Fulfilled wins there, which I recommend you see NOW). Soon there will be new releases from these producers like Battleslut Galactica where Stacy Sunset will take the Sci-Fi porn and make it into art.

Happy Birthday Dave,
Molested

I just had to do this..

Read it again, and again, and again - and then once more.

Really?

Diving Inside!

Once when I was out the entire night due to intoxication of various narcotics that caused my inability to get home I didn’t know what was going on at home, you see – I have a computer.

Now, simple maths for you:

(Computer is Female)

(I was away for more than one day and a night)

(Female) x (Not checking in for an entire night) = Computer goes on strike.

I came home the day after and I sat in front of my computer to have some fun, but no. It was now not working. Broken, I couldn't turn it on. It just happened all of the sudden, I don’t know but I suspect that my computer had attained Artificial Intelligence as there was no hardware failure, and as I watch a lot of porn on my computer I assume my computer had discovered what sex she was supposed to be.

Hence my computer does as females do, lets one emotion take over everything.

I concluded that I’d try to answer the same way and ignore the problem and take a few days off from the computer and see if anything would automatically fix itself. Like females – it was utterly beyond repair by itself, and I started to crack, my will was going down the drain as the female took control of everything I did – I started to panic. What I did was quite amazing, I opened her up – and put my hand in there and did some moves I can’t describe here. After further moving and fixing I stuck my head in her to see the problem. That’s right,

I went inside her.

I did nothing but that, and when I closed her up and demanded a response (e.g. the “ON” button) she went on as if nothing had happened, all smiling.

How cold she was,
Molested

Save the whale, Fuck the man!

For those of you who do not know then I work in the tourism industry. I have received many a letter regarding almost everything in a negative form. Last year, 2006, Icelandic officials made the blunt move to go back to hunting whales. Now as you can imagine – the reaction wasn’t pretty from anyone – except the owners of the few whaling vessels here in Iceland.

Now, one of those who responded where activists, Greenpeace – you know “Save the Wale – Fuck the man” kind of people. I got a few letters regarding some people who had decided that they would never visit our country because of the official decision, as if the small tourism company I work in had anything to do with that. I decided to answer them, and I did – I got into a lot of trouble for it because it’s not in the company’s “policy” or whatever they’d like to call it. But the following reply was sent to many Greenpeace activists, and I only received one answer.


Dear Mr. Mrs. (Put name here),

I was at great dismay that we, a localized tourist company in Iceland, received an email regarding this particular issue. I do realize that some people think of our act as unjustifiable, and I partly agree – but if you decide to ignore Iceland as a potential attraction because of that alone I sincerely hope that you have sufficient arguments to back it up, which seem to be lacking in every declaration I get in my inbox.

Now to be honest I would’ve thought that most people that are concerned with animals should be decently conscious of it’s society, I mean – deciding to have animals as a priority target of redemption must mean that you assume the humans are “fine as it is”. Taking note that we are living in the times that we do – I would’ve imagined people to be both open-minded and have respect to the decisions of others without shunning their country or heritage because they don’t share the same opinion as the government that reigns in the given country, like ours – and probably yours too.

I find it very harsh that people can think this is justifiable. It shows great disrespect to a whole nation as individuals (now in all disregard to our whaling) – and doesn’t show any will of understanding the circumstances we are in. Now I disapprove the invasion into Iraq and Afghanistan by the US government, and later with the support of the UK and many other countries, I find it unforgivable that they assume that it has to enforce their own ideals into other countries because they think that it’s right, just because they want to appear as if it works for them. That, however, does not stop me from visiting the US or UK which I have done numerous times. I do not put any connection from a country’s nature – it’s inhabitants – and it’s government. Those are all different and shall remain so for times to come. Sometimes I suspect many people respect life of a single whale more than the life of a human being. At least they seem to be more likely to cause vandalism – protest and ridicule than those who oppose warfare or plain murder.

As a country - we have one of the lowest murder rates in the world, along with Japan (ironically for this subject, as both Japan and Iceland are targets of Greenpeace for whaling), and we do not have an army. Our police-officers are not allowed to carry firearms except for the special-force team, which is rarely used. Those examples should be enough to show that we respect human life a bit more than the next avarege-joe country, yet somehow that’s not even considered when people blatantly declare that we should be ashamed for killing whales – if you feel that it’s wrong – then you should be able to argue that the killing of all wild-life animals is wrong, and I don’t see that happening.

Remember that the power of decision here in Iceland lies in the hands of few people, like in many other countries – I, for instance, totally agree that whaling is unjustifiable for us because we lose alot more than we could possibly gain from it. And that’s a fact. We get very bad publicity in other countries and many tourists decide not to visit Iceland for that reason alone, or at least say they won’t, which we could never confirm one way or the other. However, to be so narrow-minded that you let our whaling influence whether you could visit Iceland or not is simply beyond my grasp of understanding.

I understand your opinion though – and I respect it as well – but it appears ours are not the same. I don’t wipe out the option of coming to your country, experience it’s nature and society because of a decision that wasn’t even made by you as an individual. About 95% (remember that 48,7% of all statistics are made up on the spot) of Iceland’s population didn’t have a call for that decision and most of them, like myself, don’t even see why or how we made it.

You have to realise that we recently stopped our 60 year “co-operation” with the US air-force where we were rarely on the receiving-end of any favours – this has probably caused a minor inferiority-complex in our government offices and may be just the reason we made this ill-thought decision. Some people could define this situation as "Standing up to the Big Brother", because he just left. But that’s completely theoretical. You can assume that this mindset within our government is most likely a temporary one and will phase out soon.

Please reconsider your stance against our people – instead of the whales and our government.

Best regards,
Molested

Shit on my chest and you expect me to smile?

This will have to stop!

I have grown weary and tired of the filth I’m about to describe. It’s a known fact that people tend to abuse the sensitivity of others and forward spiteful and thoughtless lies from person to person – lasting for years at times. What am I talking about?

This:

Now you will have to be shitting me. Are people this shallow and disgusting that they actually don’t take this with a grain of salt? Is this believable? Is someone out there who actually assumes this is the god given truth? “Aw, this is soooo cute! It’s so good to know of the kindness
of this world!! AWW!”

This is utter shit. It’s not the only example of fake drama forced upon us, oh no, this is only one of many. How do I know of such things anyhow? It’s because I receive this inexplicable shit by email. Not from one person, no, that would be tolerable, but each time a picture with some shit text embedded to it pops up on the internet – I receive hundreds of copies of the same photo from people I haven’t even met!

“Well – this is such a cute and innocent picutre – I better send it to every single email address in the entire known world!” This appears to be the state of mind of the average Joe who sees a photo of this kind, it’s just so incredibly cute that everyone in the world must feel the same.

If you would see this photo:

Would you blindingly send it to as many individuals humanly possible, then particularly to people you don’t even know? Just to make it clear to you, girls namely, if I get a photo from you and I barely know you – this is one of the last things I want to receive in my inbox. It’s fucking spam, and you know it!

Here’s another good one:

This is one of the classic messages brought to us by these photos, you always seem to be obliged to hug someone or tell him that you love him. I for one think that’s completely unnecessary, like I’d be walking down the street and I see someone who had lost his eye – and I have to hug him because of an email! I’m not quite keen on that you see, as the hardcore femi-nazis would quickly express their distaste in the public affection shown by the individual and I’d be sued for sexual harassment. I mean – who in their right mind goes down the street and hugs a fucking person?

Just a rant. Take with caution.

Feminists and the Nazis

Excuse the unfinished feel about the article, but this is about 4 years old and has only received minor adjustments – I was angry and loudmouthed then and I hope you realize that I would write this in a tad more sophisticated manner today than I did back then.

__________________________

How does one define feminism? Once it was quite obvious who could be defined as a feminist; women, and men alike, who fight for equal rights for both genders or equality. How does one define equality? From the word alone you can assume that it’s definition is what it says; separate quantities are perceived as being equal to one another. If that would simply be the fighting cause and goal of modern feminism, to help women become equal to men in society, namely in the working environment, then sign me up right now, sadly – it’s not that simple.

Modern feminists seem to have been misguided somewhere which has given the average feminist a horrible reputation as a frontier of a human rights movement. Not only do the most venerable heads of this esteemed politically incorrect group mainly consist of individuals referred to as “femi-nazis” by myself. You heard me right, Femi-Nazis. They seem to have adjusted their fascist opinions on how to apply equality through the media into their little group of fascists.

Something must’ve happened to these thoughtful individuals when they try to justify their ignorance of basic civil rights as; free will, freedom of choice and freedom of speech. I’m not only referring to the ban of prostitution – no – I’m talking about the complete censorship of all media, be it on the internet or anywhere else. The Femi-Nazis seem to think that it’s a step into the right direction to forbid all media-coverage on subjects they find damaging to their gender. In my home country, Iceland, there was a woman who actually took her time to count the photos of men and women in a newspaper, and she found out that there were more pictures of men – and that was supposed to be a clear sign of bigotry and inequality.

They were also trying to force a law into effect whereas men could not be hired in a given job if the ratio between the genders was favorable to them. That is, if a man and a woman apply for a job with separate credentials – the man should not be hired if the gender ratio implies that there are less women in the given industry. I find this humorous – how the hell do you think that hiring a woman in a given position because there’s only a 35% female participation in the industry? How do you justify that as a logical step to improve the status of women? “Yes, we welcome this woman, not because she had the best credentials or history, but because she’s a woman, and for that we give her our utmost respect,” is this something that would give a good feedback from the industry to women? I don’t think so.

When you’re mindset is in a left-wing fascist gear – how do you expect support from the general public? When you are trying to overrule the logical decisions in society out of spite of how bad you’ve had it up until now you can’t expect anything less than negative coverage in the media, and please don’t throw at me that “Negative coverage is still coverage!” – yeah? So what? Negative coverage encourages negative feedback – and that’s something I don’t think a human-rights movement should be seeking out to do. Point out the errors in society, there are many, and inform us on how to correct them instead.

Now – to settle this, I want to remind you that Femi-Nazis are indeed Feminists, but not all Feminists are Femi-Nazis – don’t think I generalize you like that. The agenda is there for a reason and I acknowledge the arguments. But when political left-wing government officials here in Iceland think that creating a law implying that there should be equal gender ratio in all executive positions within all industries you can’t expect a cheer from me. To begin with, why aren’t there an equal ratio of the board members in most feminist-rights groups? Isn’t it called to be a hypocrite to expect us to do something what you can’t do for yourself?

"But we can't find enough men to do the job we expect them to do!" Really? That's exactly what most industry-leading companies say about women too, and you don't realize that fact.

Regards,

Molested

Use logic when illogical

I’ve been noticing the increasing efforts of the atheists on the Internet to denounce the existence of god or simply a “higher power”. Each time an article appears about the wonders that is god and heaven you can almost be certain that at least one that claims to be an atheist comes along and tries his best to defecate all over the beliefs of others. They actually try to refute the “light”, make you believe the light is not there and the darkness they live in is, in fact, the light itself.

I’m not religious, I am somewhat of an atheist and I even spent a few years being the annoying little brat who tries to force the all powerful doubt in the minds of the religious ones. The arguments would often evolve into a heated battle of who is the most “logical” and “realistic” on the matters, leading to the defamation of the one who believes, or at least an attempt to do so.

When I was reading a book called Meditations on First Philosophy by René Descartes I was in the middle of what he described there. That is, to undermine all his beliefs and opinions that had even the slightest of uncertainty to them. The reasoning behind the act is quite amazing, really. When your senses weren’t fully developed as a child you still managed to make a basic understanding and perception on how things work and what they are there for, from there on you start making even further beliefs / opinions as you grow older and you gain the illusion of wisdom. But how can you be so sure that your original perception was infallible? What is the source of all your beliefs? When you reevaluate your basis, you actually start to realize how easily you are proven wrong and denounced, and that's a real epiphany for everyone to experience if willing.

When I had done this I started to, for example, question my fanatic reactions to the religious, I started to doubt my own opinion – this was the outcome:

• Why do I have to assume that I can be right on a matter that’s unprovable by anyone?

• Why do I get the feeling that those who do believe are “unreasonable” or “illogical”?

• Why can I accept the fact that individuals are different, but I still can't accept that beliefs and opinions are just as different too?

• Why do I seek debates on matters that are unquestionably unprovable and to see who’s the most “correct” or “logical”?

• How can I be irritated that people who are religious and disrupt me by trying to prove their faith to me, when I’m basically doing the exact same thing to them?

• If a religious person is just as convinced about his beliefs as I am, why do I think I can disprove them when they can’t do the same to me?

The conclusion revealed to me that I was trying my best to justify my arguments with reason and logic, through fanaticism, against people who did the exact same thing but based on faith and belief. I was hence essentially being fanatic, ridiculing others for acting like I myself did. I was like the crazy guy downtown screaming “JESUS LIVES,” whilst naked and covered in feces, except I wasn’t covered in feces, nor was I naked – and I didn’t talk about Jesus - and I wasn't downtown. Right, I wasn't like that type of guy at all, but you catch my drift.

I envision logic as certain belief as we try our best to create undeniable statements with the rules given to us with the cunning use of deduction. It isn't as easy as people think to accept logic over faith - it can easily overwhelm you when you actually require faith in the world and your surroundings, logic on a high level is very hard to handle - but in turn, rewarding with a feeling of self-accomplishment when the conclusions are indeed undeniable.

However, those who have been corrupted by logic and reason are often just as arrogant and self-involved with their own beliefs as the religious zealot, and that’s why you can’t ever be the hypocrite and judge the other for being the same as you – because that’s illogical. Just accept the fact that people are different, so try your best to be just that, different.

Regards,
Molested

Iceland - as stupid as it sounds

This article was written when numerous members of the American porn-industry were scheduled to hold a convention in my country, Iceland. It was somehow decided that this convention should not be held here and the reasons were just plain stupid. I put myself in a "you must be wrong, because I'm right," social-judgmenting standpoint and this was my article on the matter:

The modern hypocrisy of the Icelandic psyche.

With every year that passes it becomes more clear to me that the mentality of the Icelandic populace is becoming more and more "Americanized" and laden with hypocrisy and stupidity. It appears that we feel the need of adopting the oh-so great "do stupid things now, never ask questions" mindset. It's as if we're becoming so consumed of ourselves that it's border-lining the common sense one would like us to have. Analyzing the events of, say, the last two years or so, not only are the decisions of our government getting further away from what the people actually want, but also the people themselves are growing more self-centered and stupid with each passing day. This creates a huge gap between those who have the power and those who don't, both parties are only thinking of their own interests and curse the other for not thinking about their ego and its needs.

Let's get some grounds for those statements I've thrown at you now, to increase the built up frustration towards everything that isn't right.

There's a car crash here in Iceland and the police arrives and barricades the road, and what happens? People who got delayed by this tragic accident actually phoned up our emergency hot-line (112) to complain angrily about the delay they were experiencing and shouting the same at the police officers on duty at the crash site, apparently not considering the delay of the people who were actually in the accident, oh no, it's themselves they're worried about. It's so frustrating not being able to get to work or back home for dinner, right? I bet those injured were back home by dinner to enjoy a quiet evening with their families, one died in that accident.

People amaze me, that's for sure. We can talk about the great case of Breidavik, once a youth correction facility, that apparently has some dark past, but is now run as a well situated guest-house. When the media was covering the whole issue some of our stupid ones got the urge to call the guest house, which is in no way connected to the correction facility except the for the location, and showing great disrespect and even yelling at the owners by phone for what had happened there in the past. What is it that justifies that kind of stupidity? Where are we heading? What is going on? Did people really think that this facility was still being used as a corrupted correction facility, and the same owners were there since 40 years earlier and deserved a speech from you, the stupid one?

Now that I've shown you how our populace is growing more stupid in the past years, let's review the case of the sex-terrorists that were planning to come here.

Now as many of you know, the Snowgathering, the name of the convention, was to be held here in Iceland at the Radison SAS Hotel SAGA. Everything was dandy and fine when the decision was made, they were booked at the hotel and little or no questions were asked, just as it should be. However, it quickly became apparent what the convention was standing for, the sex industry. From then on all hell broke loose in the media. The local institution that helps victims of rape, sexual abuse and domestic violence, Stigamot, sent a letter to all those they considered important enough to see to that the oppression-laden spokesmen of that industry would not be allowed here. Soon after that everything went haywire, the mayor of Reykjavik stepped in and underlined his non-existent insight, the parliament took the case on their hands and tried to get to a decision, which they never succeed in anyhow, and failed. Then it became clear, these guests of ours were not welcome here and should be deported if they were to step onto Icelandic soil.

Now let's begin the dissection of the hypocrisy I mentioned at the beginning of this rant.

The leading argument for this decision was because the production and distribution of pornography is mostly illegal in Iceland, however, it is not illegal where these individuals live that were scheduled to attend the Snowgathering. So I conclude that we were just assuming that they were going to work on their vacation Iceland, therefore breaking our laws? Were they planning to have sex in Iceland? Is that a crime now?

In Amsterdam it is legal to smoke weed, that's not in Iceland as you should perhaps know. Let's say people who smoke weed decide to visit Iceland, would they be deported as well? Would they not be allowed to come here because we can only assume that they would smoke weed here in Iceland to? Are we really that shallow that we decide what people are likely to do when they visit us from their own country? It was clearly stated that the guests at the Snowgathering were to follow national law and they agreed to abide by them, but how could we then bypass that agreement and think they would rather break the rules than follow them? I didn't know the government had the power to predict the behavior of people of other nationalities as they've never seen them before.

Another major argument to the decision was that "we do not allow prostitution nor do we allow child-pornography". Now that's an understandable stance. However, I have no idea how we started to connect this event to either of those subjects. It's as if the femi-nazis stepped in here and made the statement about that particular connection and we blindly followed, just as we saw our government officials do it.

Prostitution? Child-pornography? The opportunity of buying children on their website? This is all what our officials were claiming in the media and that they could not allow them to come here. It's pretty obvious that I wouldn't stand for that either though, but where can this be found on their site? I've been on their website, and nowhere can I see a business proposal to buy children, nor do I see the same for adults, therefore we can safely assume that these are words pulled out of one's ass. It wouldn't surprise me if it was from the highly controversial feminist-party leadership here. You make an irrelevant statement that everybody agrees to and use it as the sharp edge of your agenda without ever actually explaining anything about it, classic - right?

To make one more point, Radison SAS hotel SAGA follows the common standards of their hotel chain, they offer pay-per-view pornography in their hotel rooms. So in fact, they support the distribution and selling of pornography. However, they do not allow the producers of the same medium to stay at their hotel in the intent of having fun in Iceland. This is the epitome of all that's considered hypocrisy, good job Iceland!

Legal prosecution is inevitable in this case as we were discriminating a class of people that live honest lives in their own country. But working at something that we consider is illegal must mean that they simply can't follow the simple rules while staying in Iceland, and that's essentially "Don't work on your vacation". It sure takes extraordinary to enforce that.

Hope this was a fun read.

Regards,
Molested